Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Please Pass out sorry on to Stephanie
Dave's out of Winter hibernation
'Stephanie
"pseudo-environmentalist"
blogs do less harm to the environment than fanzines???
once a zine is printed, it uses NO ENERGY
a blog uses constant energy as it is viewed ON A COMPUTER
that means burning fossil fuels, splitting atoms, polluting the planet
etc every second of every day, just so we can be reminded how little
you use your brain
humans make many more computers than they do printing presses
the average life-span of a computer is 5 years, a printing press at
least 25 years
I've seen 100 year old presses still being used today
50% of the worlds population owns a computer compaired to less than 1%
who own printing presses
yes, making paper uses energy. it uses lots of water. but much paper
is recycled (I recycle 90% of my paper waste) and trees that are
chopped down for paper are replaced. Coal isn't replaced back in the
ground to be dug up again for burning in power stations. Nuclear waste
isn't cleverly recycled.
a zine is biodegradable. a plastic computer isn't
really, do you EVER think about what you're writing? does RJ have no
editorial control over his blog, so he can prevent you from sticking
your foot in your mouth all the time? If he was really your friend
he'd have more concern about how stupid you make yourself look
I'm going to stick with zines over blogs. not because they are better
for the environment (the only good thing I can do for this planet is
die) but because, due to the effort involved in making a zine people
bother to switch on their brains before starting up the printing
presses
Thanks for helping the street art scene look a little bit more dumb, every day
Dave
p.s. the reason I care about the nonsense you two write on your blog
is because the majority of your readers think you are an informed
voice worth listening too. people listen to you because your blog is
"the best street art blog". you're therefore responsible for putting
idea in hundreds of thousands of minds. ideas like "zines are
dangerous to the planet" are ideas I don't want planted in peoples
brains. you're making people more stupid than they already are!'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sarcasm must not dawn on you people. It was a joke obviously. So no tirade needed.
ReplyDeleteIt's so easy to cover ones vapid pointless moronic witterings with a 'I was being sarcastic' blanket. You clearly weren't you dull boring school girl.
ReplyDeleteFancy a tit up Steph
ReplyDeleteSteph needs to be fist rogered as hard as possible and until she wakes up and smells the coffee, or my finger!
ReplyDeleteTough little bunch on here.. pick your targets well dont ya. College kids and girls. Nasty insecure bunch of little keyboard warriors. Really, grow the fuck up.
ReplyDeleteEveryone is a target, especially you Nuart, you fucking charity swindler.
ReplyDeleteThe other day she was (t)wittering on about how amused she is that street artists repeat styles from art history without even knowing it, but because she studies at Sotheby's she can see it, unlike the rest of us plebs who are presumably uneducated. The assumptions involved are so fucking patronising.
ReplyDeleteEverytime these children have an art history lesson they seem to think they have to rush to the internet and enlighten us about it. This is the problem with the internet though, it's a double edged sword...on the one hand it's a good thing that media has been democratised and anybody can state their views, but the downside is that you get people appointing themselves as experts and talking vast amounts of absolute bullshit with no quality control filter in place at all.
I'm starting to realise that maybe there was some logic in the old system where if you wanted to be an art critic you had to serve an apprenticeship as a journalist and would only be allowed your own column once you had at least demonstrated some coherence of thought and an understanding of your subject.
It's a good point, though I read something recently where a critic was singing the praises of street art for developing "abstract" and conceptual works on the street. Like it was something new, "oh look, this traditionally figurative school of street artists are beginning to understand higher concepts", enormously patronising, especially considering it took fine artists and academics 200 years to understand that a letterform can be visual art.
ReplyDeleteshe also missed the fact that some street artists know all about the real/traditional art world, and deliberately reference it so that they can appeal to curators of art museums
ReplyDeletebut I'm sure Steph No-Mates In London (according to her "I'm lonely" blog) was just being sarcastic when she said street artists have no art history knowledge
and was probably being sarcastic when she said she was lonely...
I'm being sarcastic
if intelligent people don't see it as a joke Stephanie, then stupid people won't either
ReplyDeletemeaning no one got the joke. you're the only one in the room laughing. it's no wonder we all think you're an idiot
I wont have a bad word said about Steph! She is fit as fuck! Having said that, she does smell a bit, like her botty leaks like a drain. Nothing like adult pampers couldn't solve in a jiffy!
ReplyDeleteNothing but wankers and cunts.....
ReplyDeleteI would love to smash your teeth out...
just gimme half a chance ?
A bit harsh on Bangle Gob and Stephie?
ReplyDeleteNah, go on......
Sarcasm must not dawn on you people. It was a joke obviously. So no tirade needed.
ReplyDelete